Media:
I am sick and tired of all the morons in the media who spend more time talking about Michael Jackson's plastic surgery than they do about weapons of mass destruction. When did the media become so absolutely irrelevant?

Reality:

The picture on the left is what Michael Jackson would look like if he hadn't had plastic surgery. The picture on the right is the Michael Jackson that surgery created. Needless to say, Michael Jackson's surgery is responsible for the current success of this self-made, pop icon. Face the facts, it is not reasonable to suggest that one look is better than the other --just different, and that is the only point worth illustrating --viva la difference --excuse my French.

Media pundits repeatedly discuss Michael Jackson's plastic surgery ad nauseum, and they use this topic of discussion as proof of everything from the claim that Michael Jackson is weird to the claim that Michael Jackson is a liar, because we are all supposed to predict and verify, with precision accuracy, the number of times that Michael Jackson "mutilated" himself.

Make no mistake about it, if Michael Jackson looked like the image on the left, Tom Sneddon would not dare to dispute the child welfare authorities who have made it clear that Michael Jackson did not molest anybody, and that is what makes this Prosecution an Inquisition.

Tom Sneddon and any authority who does not absolutely reject this travesty of justice is too weird, not to mention a total disgrace.

The fact that Michael Jackson is criticized for the way he looks is a symptom of depravity. Michael Jackson is a celebrity, and this society tends to turn celebrities into images rather than into the human beings they are. Marylin Monroe put it best when she said that a kiss is worth $50,000 in hollywood, but your soul is worth fifty cents. Like Michael Jackson, Marylin Monroe was portrayed because of the way she looked, and as long as we continue to ignore the sentiment she exposed human beings like Michael Jackson will not be treated fairly. Get the message?

Just in case you still missed the point, it is far easier to believe that Tom Sneddon has molested young girls than the preposterous claim that Michael Jackson is a pedophile. The tell-tale sign of a pedophile is that he cannot control himself around children, and given the fact that Michael Jackson has entertained thousands of youngsters and the only public complaint comes from 2 boys from the same, troubled family suggests that it is not very difficult to prove extortion. And just because Tom Sneddon looks like a pervert, is it fair to suggest that he has molested young girls or to seek public assistance, to substantiate suspicion? The pont is, we are not supposed to judge people because of the way they look, but the depraved, Tom Sneddon, deserves a taste of his own medicine because he targets innocent people.

Next: Dr. Murray professes his innocence !

Plus: Lynching Michael Jackson